|
|
MINISTRY OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL
FILE #:
MO1-05190
TO
MICHAEL AND
KATHY BURKO'S CALL FOR JUSTICE AS
"PUBLIC INQUIRY
FRAUD IS EXPOSED" in Public Authority COVER UP
DATED: July 6th
2001
RE:
CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
vs.
MICHAEL AND KATHLEEN BURKO
CLICK HERE-----> TO RETURN TO MAIN PAGE
VISIT OUR MAIN STORY SITE
CLICK HERE--->CRITICISM OF THE GOVERNMENT IS NO LONGER ALLOWED
You decide if a Public Authority part of the Government we pay for can do this!
TO
VIEW
THE COURT
DOCUMENTS
FILLED IN
CASE
COURT FILE
and
see the Pleadings
and
Exhibits for your self.
CLICK
ON THE COLOURED LINKS BELOW
(Hit
Return on your Browser to come back)
(FILED BY CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY)
2 STATEMENT OF DEFENCE AND COUNTER CLAIM
( FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko)
3 REPLY TO DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM
( FILED BY CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY)
4 REPLY TO REPLY OF DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
6 NOTICE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
7 FACTUM (statement of Law and Fact)
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
8 JUDGMENTS
AND ORAL REASONS OF JUSTICE WILLIAM P. SOMERS
J.
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
CONTACT
Michael and Kathy Burko
Terra
Cotta Ontario Canada
BY PHONE AND MSG. AT
1-
905- 866-8525
BY
E- MAIL CLICK HERE---->> landfraud@netscape.net
THIS
MATTER GOES BEFORE 3 JUSTICES OF THE
>> COURT OF
APPEAL FOR ONTARIO << (Ontario's highest court)
AT
OSGOODE HALL
SEE JUSTICE FIRST HAND
On
Monday the 17th of September 2001
OSGOODE
HALL TORONTO
at
10:30 A.M.
It
is open to the Public
Your
support is welcome.
>>>>>NEW SEPTEMBER 2001<<<<<
CLICK HERE----->>
EXTORTION
IN ONTARIO
how it has been set in place
see
for yourself what's going on and being covered
up !!!
<UP DATE OCTOBER 2001
More Fraud used
against the Burkos
by Ministry of Attorney General
COURT HOUSE FRAUD
SUPERIOR COURT OF
JUSTICE
Case History Report
Case History Report
is a Printed out Product available to anyone who request it
from the Motions Clerk in Civil Motions at 393 University Ave. 10th floor Toronto.
At Your Request they must Print it out, and Certify it if you want for an additional
$3.50 a page. A Case History Report shows in chronological order all documents
filed including the date filed , events scheduled (motions) and monies paid in a
legal action. It is used by Judges as proof of what Events have taken place
(such as motions) and is used in their determination of their Judgments
( IT IS RELIED UPON TO BE A TRUTHFUL COURT RECORD )
A Case History Report Can be Certified and Relied upon as Conclusive
Evidence of the Facts it contains
under the Evidence Act.
IN COURT.
Below is an actual Certified Copy of page 4 of 6 of Case History Report printed
and Certified on September 24th 2001 at 3:57 P.M. at the Civil Motions Counter
10th floor 393 University Ave. Pay SPECIAL ATTENTION to the two entries
on April 23, 2001 they are marked out by ---> arrows on the Original and
shown below as they appear on the CASE HISTORY REPORT:
" April 23, 2001
Event
Motion - Strike out Jury
Notice
10:a.m. Est. Dur.: 2:00 Hour(s)
The Honourable Mr. Justice Somers
Date Scheduled: April 18, 2001
Result Date: April 25, 2001
Fees Paid: Not Applicable
Ordered: Conservation Authority has right to sue.
Leave is granted to the
Plaintiff nunc pro tunc to commence and maintain this action.
"
NO Motion to Strike Jury Notice was ever Done as is shown here on the Record
it is a Deliberate
Fraud set in Place to Deprive the Burkos of their
Right to A Jury Trial.
No Order was ever give on the Endorsement Granting the Right To Sue.
It was Never included in the Orders of Justice Somers.
This Fraudulent Entries is an attempt to gain a Right that the Credit Valley
Conservation Authority can only get from an Act of the Provincial Legislature
( Not a JUDGE ) NO JUDGE HAS THE POWER TO CREATE A CORPORATION
WITHOUT LETTERS PATENT
FROM THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR.
SEE THE CASE HISTORY REPORT FOR YOURSELF
CLICK
Here --------> to view CASE HISTORY REPORT
The Computer System is supposed to be Secure and should not be open to the
tampering of Court Staff. Here we have Conclusive Proof that Court Records
have been Changed, altered to secure an advantage the Plaintiffs were not entitled to.
( that
is Fraud plain and Simple )
No Jury Notice was ever Stuck out or a motion done to Strike it Out.
No Order giving Right to Sue was ever Given by Justice Somers,
he didn't have the Power to GIVE THEY THAT RIGHT.
Its all FRAUD
to cover the FRAUD
pulled
by a PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
part of the Government of
Ontario.
They had to Falsify Court Records in Order to Gain an Advantage and Shut the Burkos up!
This was done with the Help of the SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE FOR ONTARIO.
CERTIFIED DOCUMENTS
DON'T LIE AND HERE THEY ARE AS PROOF!!
DENIED
>> JUSTICE <<
Judge
refuses to hear PROCEEDINGS
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
The
Following Facts have been sworn to on Affidavits
that form part
of
the PUBLIC COURT RECORD filed with the Court of
Appeal for Ontario
contained
in COURT OF
APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
FILE # C 36261
MOTION FILE # M 2732
Feel
free to View these Documents at Court of Appeal for Ontario
130
Queen St. West Toronto
On March 3th 2001 Michael and Kathleen Burko Filed Material and Scheduled
a Motion # M2732 and filed the Required Materials and paid the $110.00 fee
to go before a Justice of the Court of Appeal for Ontario on March 4th 2001.
The purpose was to Stay of Proceedings Pending the Appeal
they had filed and would later Perfect.( file all documentation)
The Rules of the Court The court provide for a Right to a STAY to prevent
Prejudice
to you pending your Appeal.
Michael and Kathleen Burko were first told by the Court Clerk that the Justice
refused to hear their Motion. The Burkos insisted and were directed to go to a
COURT ROOM before JUSTICE XXXXXXXXX. Associate Chief Justice
XXXXXXXX Refused to Hear the Motion, He also Refused to grant an abridgment
of time so that the Burkos could Schedule another Motion.
The Justice Refused to Endorse or Sign the Endorsement or render a Judgment.
Justice XXXXXX directed the Court Registrar to tell us:
" They are not to go before any other JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL,
OR BEFORE THE PANEL"
The Court Clerk tried to get us to Take Back the Documents we had filed with the
Court
as part of the Motion. (they wanted us to take it back???)
We Waited for the Judges Clerk to Return to the Court Office with the Motion that
we had Filed. We Demanded a Certified Copy of the the Notice of Motion that
was Before JUSTICE XXXXXXXXXX. First we were Refused, informing them
that it was our Right to under the Courts of Justice Act., they agreed to make a
Certified copy. Two Hours passed and the Office Manager informed us the
Document had been lost, and they had called the Police. When the Police arrived
we informed them how Documents in their Possession that were Evidence under
the Evidence Act had Disappeared.
The Police directed them to continue the search and find them or they would
have to do an occurance report.
One Clerk said "Oh give them to them" and another went to a Drawer and
got the Document which they later Certified for us.
BELOW IS A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF MOTION FILED WITH THE COURT.
That we finally had Certified and Subsequently served to all parties.
MISSING IS THE ENDORSEMENT BY THE JUSTICE.
He Refused and denied Michael and Kathleen Burko
Justice and also ordered that we have no Right of
appeal of his decision to do nothing. He barred us from
from going before another Justice or the Panel of 3 Justices
TAKE
A LOOK AT THIS NOTICE OF MOTION --->
CLICK HERE
The Burkos were Denied Justice and forced to Go to Discovery with a
Non Existing Corporation without legal Capacity. All to cover the Fraud
of
the Credit Valley Conservation Authority part of the Government of
Ontario.
There is no Justification for what was done to the Burkos. It is a matter of
Public Record and can be brought to the attention of All Citizens of Ontario.
EVERY CITIZEN OF ONTARIO HAS A RIGHT TO
A FAIR HEARING BEFORE THE COURT.
WE WERE DENIED THAT HEARING AND JUSTICE.!!!
br>
