Custom Search
| |
WILLIAM P. SOMERS J
DATED: APRIL 23RD 2001
SUPERIOR
COURT OF JUSTICE COURT ROOM 4 OSGOODE
HALL
TORONTO,
ONTARIO CANADA
Defamation
Action:
Public
Authority Credit Valley Conservation Authority brought a
Defamation
action
against private citizens Michael and Kathleen Burko
alleging the
Burkos
Defamed them in 1/2 page news paper adds and posters,
"CALLING
FOR A PUBLIC INQUIRY" after the Credit Valley Conservation
Authority
was caught registering a Fraudulent Deed to the Burkos Property.
Property
the Burkos hold by Judicial Vesting Order.
CREDIT
VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
PLAINTIFFS
VS.
MICHAEL
BURKO AND KATHLEEN BURKO
DEFENDANTS
APPELLANTS
BRAMPTON
ONTARIO COURT FILE # 99-BN-2945
TORONTO
MOTION COURT FILE # 99-CT-2945
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO # C36261
below
are true copies of the Judgments of Justice
William P. Somers J.
dated
April 23rd 2001 and the Oral Reasons filed in the
Court File.
ORAL REASONS FILED
BY JUSTICE WILLIAM P. SOMERS J.
APRIL 25TH 2001
IN COURT FILE # 99-CT-2945
VISIT OR MAIN STORY SITE
CLICK HERE--->CRITICISM OF THE GOVERNMENT IS NO LONGER ALLOWED
You decide if a Public Authority part of the Government we pay for can do this!
TO
VIEW
THE COURT
DOCUMENTS
FILLED IN
CASE
COURT FILE
and
see the Pleadings
and
Exhibits for your self.
CLICK
ON THE COLOURED LINKS BELOW
(Hit
Return on your Browser to come back)
(FILED BY CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY)
2 STATEMENT OF DEFENCE AND COUNTER CLAIM
( FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko)
3 REPLY TO DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM
( FILED BY CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY)
4 REPLY TO REPLY OF DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
6 NOTICE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
7 FACTUM (statement of Law and Fact)
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
8 JUDGMENTS
AND ORAL REASONS OF JUSTICE WILLIAM P. SOMERS
J.
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )
CONTACT
Michael and Kathy Burko
Terra
Cotta Ontario Canada
BY PHONE AND MSG. AT
1-
905- 866-8525
BY
E- MAIL CLICK HERE---->> landfraud@netscape.net
THIS
MATTER GOES BEFORE 3 JUSTICES OF THE
APPEAL
COURT OF ONTARIO (Ontario's highest court)
AT
OSGOODE HALL
SEE JUSTICE FIRST HAND
On
Monday the 17th of September 2001
COURT
OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
The
Following Facts have been sworn to on Affidavits
that form part
On
March 3th 2001 Michael and Kathleen Burko Filed
Material and Scheduled
a
Motion
# M2732 and filed the
Required Materials and paid the $110.00 fee
to
go before a Justice of the Court of Appeal for Ontario on March
4th 2001.
The
purpose was to Stay of Proceedings Pending the
Appeal
they
had filed and would later Perfect.( file all documentation)
The
Rules of the Court The court provide for a
Right to a STAY to prevent
Prejudice
to you pending your Appeal.
Michael
and Kathleen Burko were first told by the Court Clerk
that the Justice
refused
to hear their Motion. The Burkos insisted
and were directed to go to a
COURT
ROOM before JUSTICE XXXXXXXXX.
Associate Chief Justice
XXXXXXXX
Refused to Hear the Motion, He also Refused to grant
an abridgment
of
time so that the Burkos could Schedule another Motion.
The
Justice Refused to Endorse or Sign the Endorsement or
render a Judgment.
Justice
XXXXXX directed the Court Registrar to tell us:
"
They are not to go before any other JUSTICE OF THE COURT
OF APPEAL,
OR
BEFORE THE PANEL"
The
Court Clerk tried to get us to Take Back the Documents we had filed
with the
Court
as part of the Motion. (they wanted us to take it back???)
We
Waited for the Judges Clerk to Return to the Court Office
with the Motion that
we
had Filed. We Demanded a Certified Copy of
the the Notice of Motion that
was
Before JUSTICE XXXXXXXXXX. First we were
Refused, informing them
that
it was our Right to under the Courts of Justice Act., they
agreed to make a
Certified
copy. Two Hours passed and the Office Manager
informed us the
Document
had been lost, and they had called the Police.
When the Police arrived
we
informed them how Documents in their Possession that were Evidence
under
the
Evidence Act had Disappeared.
The
Police directed them to continue the search and find them or they
would
have
to do an occurance report.
One
Clerk said "Oh give them to them" and another went to
a Drawer and
got
the Document which they later Certified for us.
BELOW
IS A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF MOTION FILED WITH THE COURT.
That
we finally had Certified and Subsequently served to all parties.
MISSING
IS THE ENDORSEMENT BY THE JUSTICE.
He Refused and denied Michael and Kathleen Burko
Justice and also ordered that we have no Right of
appeal of his decision to do nothing. He barred us from
from going before another Justice or the Panel of 3 Justices
TAKE
A LOOK AT THIS NOTICE OF MOTION --->
CLICK HERE
The
Burkos were Denied Justice and forced to Go to
Discovery with a
Non
Existing Corporation without legal Capacity. All
to cover the Fraud
of
the Credit Valley Conservation Authority part of the Government of
Ontario.
There
is no Justification for what was done to the
Burkos. It is a matter of
Public
Record and can be brought to the attention of All
Citizens of Ontario.
EVERY CITIZEN OF ONTARIO HAS A RIGHT TO
WE WERE DENIED THAT HEARING AND JUSTICE.!!!
OSGOODE
HALL TORONTO
at
10:30 A.M.
It
is open to the Public
Your
support isDENIED
>> JUSTICE <<
Judge
refuses to hear PROCEEDINGS
of
the PUBLIC COURT RECORD filed with the Court of
Appeal for Ontario
contained
in COURT OF
APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
FILE # C 36261
MOTION FILE # M 2732
Feel
free to View these Documents at Court of Appeal for Ontario
130
Queen St. West Toronto
A FAIR HEARING BEFORE THE COURT.