web space | free website | Business Web Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting
JUDGMENTS OF JUSTICE
WILLIAM P. SOMERS  J
DATED:   APRIL   23RD   2001

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE   COURT  ROOM  4  OSGOODE  HALL
TORONTO,  ONTARIO  CANADA
 

Defamation Action:
Public Authority  Credit  Valley Conservation Authority brought a  Defamation
action against  private  citizens   Michael and Kathleen Burko  alleging the
Burkos  Defamed them in 1/2 page news paper adds and posters,
"CALLING FOR A  PUBLIC  INQUIRY"  after the Credit Valley Conservation
Authority was caught registering a Fraudulent Deed to the Burkos Property.
Property the Burkos hold by  Judicial Vesting  Order.

CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
                                                                   PLAINTIFFS

                                                     VS.

MICHAEL BURKO  AND KATHLEEN  BURKO
                                                                   DEFENDANTS
                                                                    APPELLANTS

BRAMPTON  ONTARIO  COURT FILE   #  99-BN-2945
TORONTO     MOTION   COURT FILE  #   99-CT-2945

COURT OF  APPEAL FOR ONTARIO  #   C36261

below  are  true  copies of the  Judgments of  Justice  William P. Somers J.
dated   April  23rd   2001  and the Oral Reasons filed in the Court File.





 

ORAL REASONS  FILED BY JUSTICE WILLIAM P. SOMERS  J.
APRIL 25TH  2001   IN     COURT FILE  # 99-CT-2945





 
 
 
 
 
 
 

VISIT OR MAIN STORY SITE

CLICK HERE--->CRITICISM OF THE GOVERNMENT IS NO LONGER ALLOWED

You decide if a Public Authority part of the Government we pay for can do this!

TO
VIEW THE COURT
DOCUMENTS FILLED IN
CASE COURT FILE
and see the Pleadings
and Exhibits for your self.

CLICK ON THE COLOURED LINKS BELOW
(Hit Return on your Browser to come back)

1 STATEMENT OF CLAIM

(FILED BY CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY)

2 STATEMENT OF DEFENCE AND COUNTER CLAIM

( FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko)

3 REPLY TO DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM

( FILED BY CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION AUTHORITY)

4 REPLY TO REPLY OF DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM

(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )

5 NOTICE OF MOTION

(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )

6 NOTICE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION

(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )

7 FACTUM (statement of Law and Fact)

(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )


8 JUDGMENTS AND ORAL REASONS OF JUSTICE WILLIAM P. SOMERS J.

(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )

9 NOTICE OF APPEAL

(FILED BY Mr. & Mrs. Burko )

CONTACT Michael and Kathy Burko
Terra Cotta Ontario Canada

BY PHONE AND MSG. AT

1- 905- 866-8525

BY E- MAIL CLICK HERE---->> landfraud@netscape.net

THIS MATTER GOES BEFORE 3 JUSTICES OF THE
APPEAL COURT OF ONTARIO (Ontario's highest court)
AT OSGOODE HALL

SEE JUSTICE FIRST HAND

On Monday the 17th of September 2001
OSGOODE HALL TORONTO
at 10:30 A.M.
It is open to the Public
Your support isDENIED >> JUSTICE <<
Judge refuses to hear PROCEEDINGS

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

The Following Facts have been sworn to on Affidavits that form part
of the PUBLIC COURT RECORD filed with the Court of Appeal for Ontario
contained in COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO FILE # C 36261
MOTION FILE # M 2732
Feel free to View these Documents at Court of Appeal for Ontario
130 Queen St. West Toronto

On March 3th 2001 Michael and Kathleen Burko Filed Material and Scheduled

a Motion # M2732 and filed the Required Materials and paid the $110.00 fee

to go before a Justice of the Court of Appeal for Ontario on March 4th 2001.

The purpose was to Stay of Proceedings Pending the Appeal

they had filed and would later Perfect.( file all documentation)

The Rules of the Court The court provide for a Right to a STAY to prevent

Prejudice to you pending your Appeal.

Michael and Kathleen Burko were first told by the Court Clerk that the Justice

refused to hear their Motion. The Burkos insisted and were directed to go to a

COURT ROOM before JUSTICE XXXXXXXXX. Associate Chief Justice

XXXXXXXX Refused to Hear the Motion, He also Refused to grant an abridgment

of time so that the Burkos could Schedule another Motion.

The Justice Refused to Endorse or Sign the Endorsement or render a Judgment.

Justice XXXXXX directed the Court Registrar to tell us:

" They are not to go before any other JUSTICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL,

OR BEFORE THE PANEL"

The Court Clerk tried to get us to Take Back the Documents we had filed with the

Court as part of the Motion. (they wanted us to take it back???)

We Waited for the Judges Clerk to Return to the Court Office with the Motion that

we had Filed. We Demanded a Certified Copy of the the Notice of Motion that

was Before JUSTICE XXXXXXXXXX. First we were Refused, informing them

that it was our Right to under the Courts of Justice Act., they agreed to make a

Certified copy. Two Hours passed and the Office Manager informed us the

Document had been lost, and they had called the Police. When the Police arrived

we informed them how Documents in their Possession that were Evidence under

the Evidence Act had Disappeared.

The Police directed them to continue the search and find them or they would

have to do an occurance report.

One Clerk said "Oh give them to them" and another went to a Drawer and

got the Document which they later Certified for us.

BELOW IS A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF MOTION FILED WITH THE COURT.

That we finally had Certified and Subsequently served to all parties.

MISSING IS THE ENDORSEMENT BY THE JUSTICE.

He Refused and denied Michael and Kathleen Burko

Justice and also ordered that we have no Right of

appeal of his decision to do nothing. He barred us from

from going before another Justice or the Panel of 3 Justices

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS NOTICE OF MOTION ---> CLICK HERE

The Burkos were Denied Justice and forced to Go to Discovery with a

Non Existing Corporation without legal Capacity. All to cover the Fraud

of the Credit Valley Conservation Authority part of the Government of Ontario.

There is no Justification for what was done to the Burkos. It is a matter of

Public Record and can be brought to the attention of All Citizens of Ontario.

EVERY CITIZEN OF ONTARIO HAS A RIGHT TO
A FAIR HEARING BEFORE THE COURT.

WE WERE DENIED THAT HEARING AND JUSTICE.!!!